Royston (Herts) Bridge Club
Release 2.19r
0 0 0 0 0 0
Pages viewed in 2026
Welcome to Royston (Herts) Bridge Club
ROYSTON BRIDGE CLUB - Competitive yet Friendly
ROYSTON BRIDGE CLUB - Competitive yet Friendly

Our sparkles like a , has a big and ♠♠♠ of bonhomie, boosted by beverage, biscuits, and banter before bridge begins.

Sessions held every Thursday at 7.00pm at the Coombes Community Centre, Burns Road, Royston.

The club has electronic scoring and computer-dealt hands so results and deals are available straight away.

Visitors are always welcome but need to come with a partner. If you are new to the area, use Find a Partner (Public) and the club will make every effort to provide a suitable partner for you.

For further details, see Information and Calendar.

◄ Do you want to learn to play bridge, or improve your play? See Learning Bridge.

We also feature a few interesting hands played at the club recently, see Hand of the Month.

Bridge 4th June 2026

Doubles, Disasters and a Distinct Lack of Slams

Royston Bridge Club’s Thursday Pairs on 4 June 2026 produced a lively evening of matchpoint bridge, with 14 pairs, 24 boards, and enough doubled contracts to keep the post-mortems going well past bedtime.

Congratulations go to Malcolm and Ron, who won the evening with an excellent 68.75%. They were closely pursued by Colin W and Miriam on 67.36%, with Pat and Nicholas taking third place on 62.85%. It was a strong top three, and the sort of scoreboard that makes the rest of us start muttering about card placement, unlucky leads and other perfectly valid explanations.

Unlike some recent evenings, this was not a night for slam bidding. In fact, there were no slams bid at all. Not one. The grand slam hunters had clearly been sedated, or perhaps everyone had collectively decided that making game was stressful enough.

That did not mean the evening lacked drama. Far from it. There were 9 doubled contracts, which is a healthy number for a club night and a mild warning sign that several players had located the red card and decided to see what happened next.

The most spectacular board was Board 10, which produced the largest swing of the night: a remarkable 1,530 points. Six of the seven tables played in clubs, many of them doubled, but one table took a different route entirely. East played 4  doubled and made only 5 tricks, giving North-South a score of +1400. That was a clear top for Therese and Norma. It was also the sort of result that makes everyone nearby suddenly become interested!

Board 18 was not far behind, with a 1,470-point spread. Most tables were involved in spade contracts, but Will and Sylvia found themselves in 5  doubled by North. They made 12 tricks for +1050, which was the top on the board. Elsewhere, East-West were able to make 4♠  at one table for -420 to North-South, so this was a board where choosing the right strain was less a technical exercise and more a lifestyle choice.

Board 19 also delivered a healthy swing of 1,060 points. Three tables played 3NT by East or West, with scores of -600, -600 and -660 for North-South. At another table, West played 5D and went four off, handing North-South +400. That was a top for Will and Sylvia, and a reminder that not all five-level adventures end with a commemorative photograph.

Board 15 gave the double card another moment in the spotlight. Saroj and Alan collected +800 after 5H doubled by East went four off. That was the top on the board. Meanwhile, one table played 4♠  by South, made it, and scored +620. A perfectly good score in normal circumstances, but at matchpoints there is always someone nearby doing something outrageous with a double.

There was also one passed-out board. On Board 6, one table decided that discretion was the better part of valour and recorded Pass Out. Elsewhere, the same board produced contracts including 4  making, 2  making, 1NT by East making, and 3♣  by East going off. This suggests the hand was either finely balanced or that seven tables were playing seven different games. Possibly both.

The most common level of contract was the three and four level, with 52 contracts at the three level and 52 at the four level. There were 78 game contracts, but no one ventured into slam territory. Hearts were the most popular strain, appearing in 50 contracts, followed by spades with 41, no trumps with 37, clubs with 22, and diamonds with 17. Diamonds were clearly the wallflowers of the evening.

One of the quirkiest boards was Board 24. Six tables played 4  by East, and five of them made exactly 11 tricks for -450 to North-South. The odd table out played 3NT by West, making 10 tricks for -430, which gave Therese and Norma a top. This is matchpoint pairs in miniature: avoid the crowd by 20 points and suddenly you are a genius.

The winners, Malcolm and Ron, put together a steady card with 5 outright tops and several other strong boards. Their evening included a top on Board 1 for 3NT making 10, a top on Board 9 for 3NT making 10, and another on Board 21 for 3  making 11. Their only outright bottom came on the final board, but by then they had done enough work to survive the landing.

So the final verdict: no slams, plenty of doubles, one passed-out board, and several contracts that will probably be described differently by declarer, dummy and the defence.

Congratulations again to Malcolm and Ron on a fine win, and thanks to everyone who contributed to an evening that proved once more that bridge is a calm, rational, mathematical game, right up until someone doubles 4H.

Hand of the Month 14th May 2026

What's my line?

Board 13 last Thursday (14th May 2026) was definitely "lucky for some"!

How would you bid the two hands as shown? Possible slams are 6, 6, 6♠ or 6NT; or do you settle for game, in 3NT, 4, 4♠ or 5?

If you were sitting South at our table, you'd be playing in a contract of 6NT with the bidding as shown, on the lead of ♣K. Plan the play.

Once you've decided on your line, click on Show Answer to see how you'd have done.
 

What happened

Declarer won the lead with ♣A, gulped, and looking no further than dummy's long diamonds, led his singleton diamond and finessed the Q with everything crossed.  Not tonight.

When the dust settled, the defence had cashed five club tricks and a diamond, for FIVE down... oops!

What should have happened

The advice given to all beginners at bridge is to count winners and losers. This hand is a case in point. There a six spade winners, and three aces in the other three suits, that makes nine. No need to count losers... if we lose the lead, it'll be a bloodbath in No Trumps!

So we need to find three more tricks to make the slam, but do we look for them in hearts or diamonds?

The knee-jerk play is to take the diamond finesse immediately at trick 2. But hang on a minute, you don't need six more tricks, just three more will do. If the heart finesse works, that's still twelve tricks, so there's no need to risk the diamond finesse. Whereas if the diamond finesse works, you're still only guaranteed two diamond tricks... which is one short of what you need. The diamond finesse is irrelevant unless West has the precise holding of a doubleton Kx. Otherwise, the suit doesn't come in without losing the lead, and you need to take the heart finesse anyway for the twelfth trick.

So cross to dummy at trick 2 with a spade and unblock the suit, then lead Q, intending to run it if East ducks. If K is onside, you have six spade tricks, four heart tricks and two side aces... that's twelve tricks, with 6NT making for a probable top.

Needless to say, West has K and this line ends in disaster. But no worse than playing on diamonds, as both red kings are offside.

In fact, not only do both red suit finesses fail, but both major suits break 4-1. So neither 6 nor 6 can be made against best defence. According to the stats, the only making slam as the cards lie is 6♠, which ironically was the only slam that wasn't bid on the night. As I said, this hand was lucky for some, but perhaps I should have said "unlucky for most"!

Dave Simmons
May 2026
 

PS I also ran the bidding and play on this deal past Andrew Robson for his thoughts.  See his useful email reply (in blue) along with a couple of [my additional comments]

Interesting Dave!

I like 1D-1S-3D-3S-4S-4N…6S   
[In in this sequence, the 3S rebid is correctly played as forcing.]

V unlucky to fail …!

In 6NT I think cross to SKJ then lead HQ, if not covered win ace, run S and D to Q - roof falling in! 
[ie try the hearts first, and if East doesn't cover, assume he doesn't have the HK and fall back on "plan B" — run the spades and hope for a favourable lie in diamonds.]

This is Royston Bridge Club's official website, Dave Simmons is the current web administrator.

Please have a browse through the website. Some pages are only available to Members. To access these pages click on the link to Members Only on the top right of the Home page to login.

Any comments or suggestions for improving the website are welcome. Members can email me direct, and non-members via Contact Us under the Information tab.

Calendar
11th June 2026
Thursday Pairs
7.00pm
Director: Will Parsons
Scorer: Will Parsons
18th June 2026
Third Thursday Pairs
7.00pm
Director: Jules Davidoff
Scorer: Ron Raine